Avatar
Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Groove problem and other. (PP: HOPS)
Avatar
Ness

Forum Posts: 1857
Subscriber Since:
October 4, 2012
Thanked 529 times in 1857 posts
Reputation: 22517
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
March 30, 2018 - 4:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Stefan said
Hi Rafal, sorry we haven’t replied to you on this one yet, but we haven’t forgotten. We’ll get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks, Stefan  

Hi Rafal,

Sorry to get back so late but I had to consult the developers to get some precise information on your problems.

Here’s the reply of Jade Hatem of Boole :

——————————

Hello Ness,

According to our records, Rafal Meckovski is using the PolyBoard Hops Post_Processor.

We hence assume that he is referring to the “Grooving by sawing” mode, because the
“Grooving by milling” mode is done on a multipass basis, and is not always centered
(its position follows the groove slack position option of the sub-method).

In PolyBoard 6, “Grooving by sawing” is always identified by the groove axis (centered)
because this machining operation is not handled by PolyBoard, but by a Hops macro.

Therefore if Rafal Meckovski wishes to modify this mode, he must intervene directly
on the corresponding macro, but this is outside the scope of PolyBoard.
______________________

Improving the control over the tool selection is a matter that we are currently discussing,
and which is a bit more complex than Rafal Meckovski’s view.

This matter must be thoroughly analyzed before we extend the current settings.

Best Regards,

Jade Hatem

————————————-

So if you want to have an outline for the grooves set the groove option to Milling.

I hope this is helpful,

Wishing you a very happy Easter week end.

All the best,

Ness

Avatar
Stefan

Forum Posts: 680
Subscriber Since:
November 8, 2013
Thanked 127 times in 680 posts
Reputation: 6581
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 29, 2018 - 10:33 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi Rafal, sorry we haven’t replied to you on this one yet, but we haven’t forgotten. We’ll get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks, Stefan

Avatar
Rafal Meckovski


Forum Posts: 62
Subscriber Since:
October 18, 2017
Thanked 20 times in 62 posts
Reputation: 812
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 27, 2018 - 9:20 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

We have few problems with grooves generation and tool choice.

1. Is there an option to generate bounding lines of the grooves instead of center lines of tools? I am aware that I can use single panel fittings or inner toolings for that, but it takes time.

2. Is there a way to have a greater control over which tool is chosen for each operation? It seems like we can only choose 1 tool per operation type per project/cabinet. Yes, we can export the project/cabinet few times with different tools and then merge files in one folder or modify .hop file, but it takes time. The most optimal way would be to include the tool choise in submethods, but unfortunately this option doesnt exist.

Thanks in advance!

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 67
Currently Online:
15
Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
terry: 253
mark nichols: 119
jimbouk: 105
syslab: 97
Christopher Paré: 97
Jack Travis: 77
Duayne Naugle: 73
Tom Cleaver: 63
Rafal Meckovski: 62
Peter Brown: 62
Newest Members:
Rafael Bo
james m
Takis Sotiris
Eugene Ponomarenko
Jorge Morais
Lindsay Hiller
Nicolas Dupont
naseer ahmed
Erik Carrillo
Walter Diana
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 8
Topics: 1137
Posts: 6590

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 3
Members: 96938
Moderators: 1
Admins: 7
Administrators: Ness, Stefan, michel melon, Carole Bosy, admin, Sunil Jaiswal, ipatrick
Moderators: Alex