Wood Designer forum
Shelf/rear double back - clash/error/bug (urgent)|Forum|WOOD DESIGNER
Home
August 7, 2014
Offline
Hi Connor,
The current latest version 7.07 is solving this issue. eventual new features will be on the forum soon.
regards
Michel
February 22, 2021
Offline
Hi,
i’ve seen comments that there has been some further updates. Has this been resolved in these new versions? I currently have 7.06F. Do you have a list of what’s been updated, as it’s not appearing on the update page posts that Stefan used to do?
August 7, 2014
Offline
Hi Connor,
this will be solved in our next release but we have no timeframe yet on this release
regards
Michel
February 22, 2021
Offline
Hi Michel,
did the developers get anywhere with this fix?
– Connor
August 7, 2014
Offline
Hi Connor,
As explained. the problem occurs when your double backs are positioned in the extremities. 100% and 0%. It does work with the 2 top shelves as the Dbacks are on 0% and 100 % only on the front side and not the backside.
The bottom shelf is on 0% and 100% for both Dbacks. So you have to move one of them to 99.99%. In your case, it is to be done on the Dback in the back. This will take away the clash.
regards
Michel
February 22, 2021
Offline
Ok Michel, thanks for your help. Hopefully the developers can find a solution, as it worked before!
See attached file from previous when Ness converted a file for me, I cut this out a month ago and it fit perfectly.
It appears to be working correct on the middle/top shelves (no clashes). Not on the bottom shelf though, maybe because of the latest update?
This was from 30th March, if that helps..
August 7, 2014
Offline
Hi Connor,
Yes, this happens when you have 2 double backs on the same shelf. The first one will work but adding a second one will create the problem. And indeed the solution given by the developers is solving the problem.
Michel
February 22, 2021
Offline
Thanks for the feedback. I tried to do this on my laptop and couldn’t replicate the same issues, so this is very strange!
Not had this problem before either.
If you try do a simmilar unit, do you get the same outcome Michel?
August 7, 2014
Offline
Hi Connor,
Here is the reply from the developers
This is due to the simultaneous presence of 2 double-backs in extreme positions (0% and 100%).
An easy method to get around this limitation is to move the second double-back by a very small
distance (a shift of 0.001 mm will be enough to generate the cut out).
We shall take a deeper look at this situation, and see if we can bring an improvement.
regards
Michel
1 Guest(s)
