Avatar
Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Is it correct to have two carriages on the same vertical plan ?
Avatar
Ness

Forum Posts: 1774
Subscriber Since:
October 4, 2012
Thanked 517 times in 1774 posts
Reputation: 21801
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
August 10, 2015 - 10:26 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi Alain,

Thanks for posting your stair project.

You can also post on the French forum at :

http://atelierbois.net/forum/

Following our conversation this morning here is a version of your stair that I have set up that will work.

I have added a landing step and set the width to 950 to give a reasonable gap between inner strings 1 and 3.

I have also taken away the spindles for clarity and rounded the first and following steps to give a more majestic start.

I this design I would suggest that the posts rest on the floor.

This makes the stair completely self supporting easier to install and eliminates the need to fix the string into the back wall.

The stringer can then be suspended between the 2 corner posts and not touch the wall which makes for a more elegant finish. 

If necessary, you can tweak the stair to suit your own specs.

Hope this is helpful.

All the best,

Ness

3d03.jpgImage Enlarger

3d01.jpgImage Enlarger
3d02.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

The following users say thank you to Ness for this useful post:

Laurent Alebarde
Avatar
Laurent Alebarde

Forum Posts: 1
Subscriber Since:
August 9, 2015
Thanked 0 times in 1 posts
Reputation: 9
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
August 9, 2015 - 10:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi all,

My question is on an esthetic and feasability points of view. My stair project is a 2/4 turn oak made with a big central stud. My shaft is only 204 cm wide. I want my stair as wide as possible, so say 102 cm per flight or even a bit more if I design it with the 1st and 3rd flights internal carriages on the same vertical plan.

Is it correct in terms of esthetic and feasability please ?stair-2_4-oak-central_stud-internal_carriages_on_same_vertical_plan.pngImage Enlarger

Unfortunatly on my 3D view, both internal carriages are missing. I don’t know why – in my design, they do exist. Here, had to set 101.99 as the flight width. If I put 102 or more, stairdesigner says one flight is too short in length. But my question remains even if instead of beeing on the same vertical plan, they have only their two internal faces on the same vertical plan.

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 64
Currently Online:
14
Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
terry: 253
mark nichols: 119
jimbouk: 105
Christopher Paré: 97
syslab: 97
Jack Travis: 77
Duayne Naugle: 71
Peter Brown: 62
Rafal Meckovski: 59
Thusitha Karunatilake: 55
Newest Members:
Horia Simon
Gjoko Stenkoski
Abdulrahman alhumaimi
Debra Souma
Henchel Chamboko
Debra Souma
Ronie Hernando
Vik Sharma
viral chaudhari
Glen Rozier
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 8
Topics: 1056
Posts: 6140

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 3
Members: 93103
Moderators: 3
Admins: 7
Administrators: Ness, Stefan, Carole Bosy, admin, Sunil Jaiswal, ipatrick, Talal
Moderators: michel melon, D-Alexandre, Laly Mulero