Avatar
Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
landing
Avatar
Michel

Forum Posts: 835
Subscriber Since:
August 7, 2014
Thanked 170 times in 835 posts
Reputation: 8433
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
June 20, 2022 - 6:21 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi Duayne,

 

Square and rectangular are always available. Round is only available on vertical elements but I will mention this to our developers together with the penetration option which only relates to horizontal tube rails

 

regards

Michel 

Avatar
Duayne Naugle

Forum Posts: 121
Subscriber Since:
March 1, 2015
Thanked 4 times in 121 posts
Reputation: 713
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
June 17, 2022 - 8:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Got it. , something I would like to see in future releases : 

#1. Make it so horizontal spindles have the option to be square or round. 
#2. Allow an option for it’s penetration into the post. 

Avatar
Michel

Forum Posts: 835
Subscriber Since:
August 7, 2014
Thanked 170 times in 835 posts
Reputation: 8433
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
June 17, 2022 - 7:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi Duayne,

 

The size you see on the cutting list is the diagonal measurement between the 2 ends which creates the difference because the width of the handrail is bigger than the width of the horizontal spindle. The actual side length is equal

 

size.pngImage Enlarger

 

regards Michel

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Duayne Naugle

Forum Posts: 121
Subscriber Since:
March 1, 2015
Thanked 4 times in 121 posts
Reputation: 713
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
June 17, 2022 - 2:04 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

i would like to know why the #3 handrail on the right is 84 1/8" on the above project  but the horizontal spindles directly under it are only 82 3/4"

 it doesn't make sense to me .

Avatar
Michel

Forum Posts: 835
Subscriber Since:
August 7, 2014
Thanked 170 times in 835 posts
Reputation: 8433
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
June 12, 2022 - 10:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi Duayne,

 

Ok, What I would do as in the below picture. I would double the penetration (3/4") in the newels 3, 11 and 8 and also in the left stringboards 3 and 4. (red rectangle). Production-wise I would leave all penetrations to 3/8" but double the penetration value in the above-mentioned parts. That leaves you with a 3/8" expansion gap in the back of the landing.

 

On left stringboards 2 and 5, I would fix the landing with screws but you have to predrill the hole for the screw with a bigger diameter than the screw shaft to allow lateral movement. (arrows in the picture). On the front side of the landing, I would fix the landing firmly so that the retraction and expansion will be lead to the back where you have the extended penetration. 

In the grain direction, you can leave a little extra moving space but this will be very reduced as the main correction will happen perpendicular to the grain.

mid-landing.pngImage Enlarger

As you noticed I moved right handrail nr2, newel 5 and 6 about 3/8" to get rid of that piece of step in the back of the newel as this will be negatively impacted

correction.pngImage Enlarger

Hope this helps

 

Michel 

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Duayne Naugle

Forum Posts: 121
Subscriber Since:
March 1, 2015
Thanked 4 times in 121 posts
Reputation: 713
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
June 11, 2022 - 4:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

no  it is the middle landing step  , it is 72" x 38" by 1 5/8" , it is going to expand and shrink with the change in seasons , 

Avatar
Michel

Forum Posts: 835
Subscriber Since:
August 7, 2014
Thanked 170 times in 835 posts
Reputation: 8433
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
June 9, 2022 - 4:57 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi Duayne,

Sorry for the delay on this.

It is about the top landing. How is this supported? Is it on a concrete base? The expansion and contractions will be mainly perpendicular to the grain and in a very reduced way in the grain direction. 

Is it visible from below? I am trying to picture the finished situation. If not visible from below you can use a plywood base and make separated floor elements on top.

Regards

Avatar
Duayne Naugle

Forum Posts: 121
Subscriber Since:
March 1, 2015
Thanked 4 times in 121 posts
Reputation: 713
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
May 30, 2022 - 1:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

i have a stairway to do that has a large landing on a switch back set of stairs , my question is , should i allow extra in the mortise for expansion and contraction , since we live near the ocean i do expect the the landing will expand and contract with the seasons , what percautions should i take ? 

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 256
Currently Online: Gábor Polonyi, Michael Safwat
Guest(s) 1
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
terry: 253
mark nichols: 157
Kerf Works: 143
Tom Cleaver: 140
Duayne Naugle: 121
Conor Devoy: 121
jimbouk: 105
Syslab Corp: 103
Stu Robertson: 97
Christopher Paré: 97
Newest Members:
Catalin Banita
VINAYAK PAI
testing mango
kifelew Mamo
j c
KAILEY FIEWIG
Hugo Ruiz
oscar zabaleta
oscar zabaleta
Deidra Jappa
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 7
Topics: 1721
Posts: 9576

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 4
Members: 146303
Moderators: 0
Admins: 12
Administrators: Ness, Stefan, Michel, Carole, Alex, admin, Laly, ipatrick, Fatima, Crystal, Jem Turner, Darren